ECO-EDUCATION ACTIVITIES AT NATIONAL PARKS
AND STATE NATURE RESERVES IN 2002
(Based on letters from the Russian Ministry of Natural Resources
#63-01/165
and #63-01/166 dd. September 3, 2003)
By the end of 2002, separate divisions specializing in ecological education
were functioning as independent units in 17 out of 35 national parks and
in 70 out of 95 state nature reserves supervised by the Russian Ministry
of Natural Resources (MNR). In 3 reserves (Visimsky, Ust’-Lensky and
Tsentralnosibirsky) and in 2 national parks ecological education
was part of the staff of scientific departments, and in 2 national parks
— of tourism and recreation departments, while Kenozersky national
park established its own eco-education service. Eco-education workgroups
were functioning in Voronezhsky, Zhigulevsky and Kabardino-Balkarsky
reserves. In 9 reserves eco-education was conducted by staffers in other
divisions: Bastak, Bolshoi Arktichesky, Komsomolsky, Kuznetsky Alatau,
Mordovsky, Olekmansky, Orenburgskiy, Prioksko-Terrasny and Rdeisky.
In 7 reserves (Dzhugdzhursky, Magadansky, Norsky, Rostovsky, Sayano-Shushensky,
Chernye Zemli, Yugansky) scientific departments included 1-5 specialists
in ecological education and training. The total of 391 staffers responsible
for eco-education worked in the Russian state nature reserves. In national
parks a total of 79 staffers were responsible for eco-education. On average,
4 persons were engaged in eco-education in reserves, and 2 — in national
parks.
In 2002, staffers of eco-education departments of 16 reserves and 8 national
parks completed upgrading and professional training courses.
Ecological education activities in national parks and state nature reserves
in 2002 were carried out along the following lines:
Management of museums, visit-centers, stationary, temporary and itinerant
exhibition displays;
Interaction with mass media (articles, appearances on radio and TV,
periodical publications);
Promotion and publication;
Work with schoolchildren;
Interaction with teachers and education authorities;
Liaison with local population;
Organization of ecological festivals and ecological PR actions.
Additionally, national parks provided visitors services visitors (excursions,
tours, etc.) as required by current legislation.
Museum Management
In 2002, visitor centers were established or were under construction in
8 national parks and 46 reserves. By the end of the year, 57 visitor centers
in reserves and 16 visitor centers in national parks were receiving visitors.
Nature Museums were functioning in 37 reserves and 12 national parks.
Both visitor centers and Nature Museums were functioning in 19 reserves:
Astrakhansky, Baikalsky, Barguzinsky, Basegi,
Bashkirsky, Bolshoi Arktichesky, Volzhsko-Kamsky, Voronezhsky,
Darvinsky, Kandalakshsky, Kronotsky, Lazovsky,
Pechero-Ilychsky, Sayano-Shushensky, Taimyrsky, Teberdinsky,
Khopersky, Tsentralno-lesnoi, Shulgan-Tash.
In 2002 national parks set up 232 exhibition displays for different audiences,
and reserves — 603. The most displays were organized by the reserves:
Baikalsky, Lazovsky, Poronaisky, Privolzhskaya
Lesosteppe, Taimyrsky, Khankaisky, and thenational
parks: Plescheevo Ozero, Russky Sever and Sebezhsky.
Beside these PNAs more than 10 exhibition displays were set up by the reserves:
Bashkirsky, Bolshekhekhtsyrsky, Botchinsky, Verkhne-Tazovsky,
Darvinsky, Zhigulevsky, Kavkazsky, Komandorsky,
Sayano-Shushensky, Ust-Lensky, Khakassky, Tsentralno-Lesnoi,and Shulgan-Tash,and the national parks: Valdaisky,
Orlovskoye Polesye, Smolenskoye Poozerye, Sochinsky, and
Ugra.
Children’s art displays were set up by 69 reserves and 19 national parks
and were very popular. The most active in organizing such displays were
the reserves: Baikalsky, Lazovsky, Taimyrsky, Ust'-Lensky and Khankaisky,
as well as the national parks: Plescheevo Ozero, Smolenskoye Poozerye
and Russky Sever.
In 48 reserves and 15 national parks eco-education specialists set up 153
and 39 photo-exhibitions respectively. The greatest number of photo-exhibitions
were organized by the reserves: Baikalsky (12), Komandorsky (11),
Botchinsky (10), Laplandsky (8), Porpnaisky (6), Altaisky,
Bastak, Kuznetsky Alatau, Norsky and Shulgan-Tash (5 each), and
the national parks: Russky Sever, Sebezhsky and Plescheevo
Ozero.
In 35 nature reserves and in 14 national parks eco-education specialists
set up 107 and 43 nature conservation exhibition displays respectively.
Among reserves, the most active here were Darvinsky (15), Taimyrsky(14),
Poronaisky (8), Baikalsky (7)and Bashkirsky (6).
Art exhibitions were set up by 31 reserves (72 displays) and 10 national
parks (34 displays). In 2002, the most active here was Plescheevo Ozero
national park, which organized the greatest number of displays of the
kind (12) as well as the reserves: Lazovsky (8), Privolzhskaya
Lesosteppe (5), Norsky, Poronaisky (4 each), Bogdinsko-Baskunchaksky,
Kavkazsky, Nizhne-Svirsky and Taimyrsky (3 each).
21 reserves and 8 national parks set up 67 literature exhibition displays
(40 and 27 respectively). The leaders here were the national parks Plescheevo
Ozero and Sochinsky, and the reserves Kavkazsky, Lazovsky,
Privolzhskaya Lesosteppe, Sayano-Shushensky, Taimyrsky, Tsentralno-Lesnoyand Schylgan-Tash.
As for the variety of the exhibition topics (5 each) the most active were
set up by 14 reserves (Taimyrsky, Lazovsky, Poronaisky, Privolzhskaya
Lesosteppe, Ust'-Lensky, Tsentralno-Lesnoy, Khakassky, Kavkazsky, Sayano-Shushensky,
Barguzinsky, Zhigulevsky, Shulgan-Tash, Magadansky and Polistovsky)
and 7 national parks (Valdaisky, Orlovskoye Poleskye, Plescheevo Ozero,
Russky Sever, Smolenskoye Poozerye, Sochinskyand Ugra).
Exhibition displays of four kinds were set up by 9 reserves: Verkhne-Tazovsky,
Astrakhansky, Kronotsky, Belogorye, Daursky, Denezhkin Kamen’, Stolby, Olekmansky
and Malaya Sos’va.
So-called “pet corners” and animal houses were displayed to visitors in
9 reserves (a total of 23 in the reserves Pechero-Lychsky, Poronaisky,
Prioksko-Terrasny, Oksky, Taimyrsky, Teberdinsky, Khingansky, Tsentralno-Lesnoy
and Cherniye Zemli) and in 6 national parks. In Shulgan-Tash,
a bee apiary display was open for visitors. Ten reserves (Belogorye,
Verkhne-Tazovsky, Volzhsko-Kamsky, Kavkazsky, Kandalakshsky, Kivach, Lazovsky,
Sayano-Shushensky, Ust'-Lensky and Tsentralsno-Chernozemny) and
8 national parks had exhibitions of live plants.
Visitor Services
In addition to nature museum excursions the visitors to national parks
enjoyed field excursions and various tours:
Walking tours (for visitors on their own) — in 19 parks;
Boat trips (for tourists and visitors)— in 14 parks;
Car and bus tours (for tourists and visitors) — in 9 parks.
In 2000, 208 ecological paths and routes (12,028 km total) were open in
32 national parks (376 km per NP, on average).
A total of 499,315 visitors in groups or specially organized tours passed
through national parks (on average, 17 218 visitors per NP), including 41,399
tourists from abroad.
The greatest number of visitors passed trough Sochinsky, where 290,100
legal visitors were registered. Most popular among foreign tourists was
Kurshskaya Kosa — 36,389 visitors.
Interaction with the Mass Media
In 2002, the staffers of reserves and national parks wrote 2,625 articles
which were published in periodicals (1801 articles by reserve specialists
and 824 articles — by NP specialists), including 1801 (1210 and 591 accordingly)
— in regional, 267 — in federal (187 and 80 accordingly) and 557 (404 and
153 accordingly) — in the local press. On average, 25 articles per reserve
or national park.
Articles by staffers of 42 reserves and 15 national parks were published
in national editions. Most distinguished here were the reserves Astrakhansky
(35), Kavkazsky (21),and Khingansky (11), and
the national parks Smolenskoye Poozerye (29), Plescheevo Ozero
(17), and Sebezhsky (10).
Articles written by the staffers of 78 reserves and 23 national parks were
published in the regional press. More than 50 articles published in the
regional press belong to the reserves Sikhote-Alinsky (100), Laplandsky
(86), Belogorye (56) and Khakassky (55), and the national
parks Nizhnyaya Kama (168), Plescheevo Ozero (112) and Smolenskoye
Poozerye (56).
Articles by the staffers of 33 reserves and 23 national parks were published
in the local press. Here the leaders were the reserves Darvinsky (53),
Putoransky (37), Khankaisky (34), Bureinsky (33), Komsomolsky
(27), Kaluzhskiye Zaseki (19), Teberdinsky (18), Altaisky
(16), Bryansky Les, Kavkazsky (15 each), Yugansky (14),
Visimsky, Vishersky (12 each), Botchinsky, Rostovsky
(11 each), and the national parks Shushensky Bor (36), Meschersky
(26), Ugra (25), Chavash Varmane (18), Taganai
(14) and Nechkinsky (12 articles).
Fifteen reserves (Altaisky, Bryansky Les, Bureinsky, Visimsky, Darvinsky,
Denezhkin Kamen’, Dzherginsky, Kronotsky, Mordovsky, Putoransky, Ubsunurskaya
Kotlovina, Khakassky, Tsentralno-Lesnoy, Tsentralno-Chernozyemny, and
Shulgan-Tash)and 6 national parks (Losiny Ostrov, Nechkinsky,
Paanayarvi, Tunkinsky, Ugra, and Shushensky Bor) practiced interaction
with the press most actively.
The greatest number of articles belongs to the staffers of 9 reserves (Sikhote-Alinsky
— 100, Baikalsky — 97, Laplandsky — 95, Astrakhansky
— 77, Darvisnky — 65, Khakassky — 62, Belogorye —
59, Putoransky — 53 and Tsentralno-Lesnoy — 48) and 3 national
parks (Nizhnyaya Kama — 170, Plescheevo Ozero — 129 and Smolenskoye
Poozerye — 85).
Appearances on TV, TV reports and programs play important role in ecological
education. In 2002, the number of appearances with the participation or
support of reserve specialists came to 1,105. National channels broadcasted
53 reports developed with the participation of reserve staffers, and 20
— with the participation of NP staffers, regional TV stations broadcasted
449 and 120 reports respectively, and local TV channels — 336 and 127 respectively.
Most distinguished here were the national parks Nizhnyaya Kama (68
TV reports), Sochinsky (49) and Smolenskoye Poozerye (24)
as well as the reserves Bolshoi Arktichesky (61), Laplandsky (51),
Astrakhansky (34), Bastak (33), Barguzinsky (30), Putoransky,
Belogorye (29 each), Khakassky (26), Altaisky (25),
Magadansky, Teberdinsky(22 each), Nenetsky (21), Khingansky
and Olekmansky (20 each).
National TV broadcasted reports on 21 reserves and 4 national parks. Most
active here were the reserves Laplandsky (15 TV appearances),
Oksky (5), Teberdinsky and Tsentralno-Lesnoy (4 each).
Regional TV broadcasted reports about 61 reserves and 16 national parks.
The leaders here are the reserves Bolshoi Arktichesky, Laplandsky,
Astrakhansky, Bastak, Magadansky,and the national
parks Nizhnyaya Kama, Smolenskoye Poozerye, Kenozerskyand
Taganay. Forty-six reserves and 8 national parks were presented on
local TV stations. The greatest number of local TV appearances belonged
to the national parks Sochinsky (49 TV appearances) and Nizhnyaya
Kama (45), and reserves Baikalsky (27), Putoransky (26),
Nenetsky (20), Bashkirsky (19), Teberdinsky (18) and
Kavkazsky (17 appearances).
Materials provided by the Putoransky, Rostovsky, Tungussky and
Tsentralno-Lesnoy reserves and the Valdaisky and Ugra national
parks appeared on local and national television.
In 2002, 98 video films were made in 55 reserves and 12 national parks
(65 in reserves and 33 in national parks), 31 of them (27 and 4 respectively)
PNAs made themselves, and 55 video films (41 and 14) were made by outside
organizations. Both possibilities were used by the reserves Baikalsky,
Bashkirsky, Voroninsky, Daursky, Kivach, Magadansky, Malaya Sos'va, Poronaisky,
Severo-Osetinsky, Taimyrsky, Tsentralno-Lesnoy, Shulgan-Tash, Yuzhno-Uralsky,
and the national parks Meschera, Sebezhsky, Smolenskoye Poozerye,and Sochinsky.
577 reports about 54 reserves and 264 reports about 22 national parks were
broadcasted on radio stations. National radio stations broadcasted information
65 times on 65 reserves and 14 times on national parks, regional radio stations
— 311 and 107 respectively, and local stations — 201 and 143 times respectively.
Most active here were the reserves Laplandsky (61 reports), Belogorye
(57), Bolshoi Arktichesky (42), Teberdinsky (29), Prioksko-Terrasny
(28), Darvinsky (20),and the national parks Niznyaya
Kama (59), Kenozersky and Sebezhsky (27 reports each).
Dissemination of information through periodicals issued by reserves and
national parks plays an important role in developing liaison with the local
people and work with visitors. In 2002, 17 reserves and 11 national parks
issued their own information editions on a regular basis. The largest circulation
was achieved by the 12 editions of the Darvisnsky reserve (100,000
copies) and the 12 editions of the Denezhkin Kamen reserve (4,300
copies). Slightly smaller was the circulation of 26 editions of the Yuzhno-Uralsky
reserve. Bolshoi Arktichesky, Kerzhensky and Khakassky produced
11 editions each. The reserves Magadansky (10 editions), Katunsky
(7), Vitimsky (4), Khopersky (4), Astrakhansky (2),
Kostomukshsky (2), Shulgan-Tash (2), Zhigulevsky and Norsky
(1 edition each) also published their own editions.
Among national parks, the largest circulation was achieved by the newspapers
issued by national parks Ugra (around 4,000 copies), Losiny Ostrov,
Prypyshmenskiye Bory (2,000 each), Plescheevo Ozero, Smolenskoye
Poozerye, Sochinsky (1,000 each) and Shushensky Bor (just under
1,000 copies).
Supplements to regional and local newspapers were issued with the financial
support and expertise of 14 reserves (Bashkirsky, Botchinsky, Bryansky
Les, Bureinsky, Daursky, Zhigulevsky, Zeisky, Kerzhensky, Kurilsky, Nizhne-Svirsky,
Nurgush, Sokhondinsky, Khankaisky, Tsentralno-Lesnoy) and 2 national
parks (Zabaikalsky and Russky Sever). Thirteen reserves and
7 national parks ran their own regular conservation columns in periodicals.
In 2002, electronic editions were developed by 2 nature reserves (2 editions
by Dzhugdzhursky, and 1— by Khakassky) and 3 national parks
(Mariy Chodra, Plescheevo Ozero and Pribaikalsky).
In 2002, the process of introducing the Internet continued steadily. Eighteen
reserves (Baikalsky, Barguzinsky, Belogorye, Bogdinsko-Baskunchaksky,
Bolshyaya Kokshaga, Bolshoi Arktichesky, Verkhne-Tazovsky, Zhigulevsky,
Komandorsky, Kronotsky, Oksky, Polistovsky, Stolby, Taimyrsky, Khakassky,
Khingansky, Tsentralno-Lesnoy,and Shulgan-Tash)and
15 national parks (Bashkiriya, Vodlozersky, Zyuratkul’, Mariy Chodra,
Meschera, Paanayarvi, Plescheevo Ozero, Pribaikalsky, Russky Sever, Sebezhsky,
Smolenskoye Poozerye, Taganai, Ugra, Shorsky,and Shushensky
Bor) had their own websites or web-pages on the websites of other organizations.
Promotion and Publication
In 2002, 22 reserves issued 11,061 copies of leaflets and 11 national parks
— 11,408 copies. Most of these materials were provided by the reserves Bolshaya
Kokshaga (4,000 copies), Komsomolsky (2,000), Zeisky (1,000),
Teberdinsky (1,000), Shulgan-Tash (1,000), and the national parks
Losiny Ostrov and Meschera (2,000 copies each).
A total of 119,913 booklets were published in 18 national parks, and a
total of 52,840 copies in 21 reserves. The best results here were shown
by the national parks Sochinsky (105,000 copies), Ugra (3,500),
Losiny Ostrov (3,000), Kenozersky (2,100), and Sebezhsky
(2,000), and the reserves Kerzhesnky (10,000), Vishersky (5,000),
Baikalsky (4,520), Bolshaya Kokshaga (4,500), Barguzinsky
(4,050), Zeisky, Kivach, Severo-Osetinsky (3,000 each), Tsentralno-Lesnoy
(2,520), Visimsky (2,000), Norsky (1,560), Sayano-Shushesnky
(1,240), Bashkirsky (1,050), Voroninsky, Darvinsky, Kaluzhskiye
Zaseki, Nurgush, Khakassky, Shulgan-Tashand Yuzhno-Uralsky
(1,000 each).
Brochures were published by 11 reserves (a total of 7,366 copies) and 8
national parks (8,724 copies).
Thirty-six reserves and 11 national parks produced their own wall calendars
(a total of 11,345 copies by 20 nature reserves and a total of 3,801 copies
by 5 national parks) and pocket calendars(a total of 27,501 copies
by 16 reserves and 641,081 copies by 8 national parks).
Photo-albums were chosen as presentation materials by13 reserves and 8
national parks (1,082 copies were produced by reserves and 3,642 copies
by parks).
Conservation posters were produces by 8 reserves (Astrakhansky, Basegi,
Bolon'sky, Vishersky, Lazovsky, Norsky, Teberdinsky, and Tsentralno-Lesnoy)and 4 national parks (Samarskaya Luka, Nizhnyaya Kama, Meschera and
Kenozersky).
Eight reserves and 6 national parks produced badges, batches ranging from
100 to 5,000 copies, including reserves Kavkazsky (5,000 copies),
Shulgan-Tash (1,000), Voroninsky (850), Kandalakshsky (400),
Komsomolsky (251), Khakassky (200), Norsky (194), Stolby
(100),and national parks Plescheevo Ozero (1,200), Sebezhsky
(1,000), Losiny Ostrov and Smolenskoye Poozerye (500 each),
and Nizhnyaya Kama (200 copies).
Emblems were produced by 5 reserves (Verkhne-Tazovsky, Komandorsky,
Stolby, Tsentralno-Lesnoy and Polistovsky) and 3 national parks (Plescheevo
Ozero, Shushensky Bor and Samarskaya Luka).
Pennants were produced in 4 national parks and 2 reserves (Ugra
— 1,000 copies, Nizhnyaya Kama, Plescheyevo Ozero, Samarskaya
Luka, Daursky and Stolby — 150 each). Reserves Verkhne-Tazovsky,
Stolby and Tsentralno-Lesnoy produced souvenir medals.
Work with Schoolchildren
In 2002, work with schoolchildren was one of the most important and successful
activities in reserves and national parks. Regular courses on conservation
were given to schoolchildren in 13 reserves (Baikalsky, Belogorye, Bolshaya
Kokshaga, Daursky, Kavkazsky, Kurilsky, Lazovsky, Magadansky, Poronaisky,
Sayano-Shushensky, Severo-Osetinsky, Khakassky and Tsentralno-Lesnoy)
and in 7 national parks (Kenozersky, Nizhnyaya Kama, Paanayarvi, Plescheyevo
Ozero, Sebezhsky, Sochinsky, Shushensky Bor). The best results here
belong to the staffers of Plescheevo Ozero NP who gave courses to
4,380 schoolchildren. Single lectures on environmental topics were given
by the staffers of 57 reserves and 16 national parks.
Specialized workshops and conferences were held in 36 reserves and 12 national
parks. Over 20 thousand schoolchildren took part in these events. Most active
here were the reserves Yuzhno-Uralsky, Bashkirsky, Zhigulevsky and
Khopersky,and the national parks Valdaisky, Paanayrviand Nizhnyaya Kama.
In 2002, 53 reserves and 17 national parks organized numerous contests
and quizzes involving some 20,000 children and teenagers. Among reserves
the largest campaigns were initiated by Privolzhskaya Lesosteppe (4,970
participants), Laplandsky (3,000), Voroninsky (1,543),
Vitimsky (1,380), Kostomukshsky (1,200), Lazovsky (2,135),
Verkhne-Tazovsly (1,050), Daursky (947), Kavkazsky (961),
Belogorye (820), Bolshaya Kokshaga (608), Magadansky (600),
Poronaisky (489), Prisursky (470), and Severo-Osetinsky (400).
The staffers of 31 reserves and 11 national parks ran various clubs on
conservation topics. Most active here were the reserves Belogorye, Komandorsky,
Lazovsky, Privolzhskaya Lesosteppe, Sayano-Shushensky, Khakassky, and
the national parks Sebezhsky, Kenozersky and Paanayarvi.
Research, conservation and other field trips and several-day expeditions
took place in 33 reserves and 12 national parks. The largest number of schoolchildren
involved belongs to the Sochinsky NP (669 children) and to the reserves
Bashkirsky (455) and Kivach (315).
School forestry and conservation brigades were organized in 5 reserves
(Bastak, Belogorye, Verkhne-Tazovsky, Teberdinsky and Khakassky)
and 16 national parks. Orlovskoye Polesye PN ran 8 of them, and the
national parks Nizhnyaya Kama and Shushensky Bor — 5 each.
Most popular among schoolchildren were the large events: concerts(26
reserves), festivals and rallies (39 reserves). In 2002, 105 concerts were
held in the following reserves: Lazovsky (1,880 people), Privolzhskaya
Lesosteppe (1,600), Kavkazsky (1,270), Voroninsky (1,009),
Khakassky (1,000), Bastak (550), and Belogorye (508).
Large school festivals and rallies were held in reserves Bolshaya Kokshaga
(5,574 participants), Privolzhskaya Lesosteppe (2,000), Khakassky
(1,500), Sayano-Shushensky (1,280), Malaya Sos’va (1,115),
Bastak (1,100), Voroninsky (1,080), Yuzhno-Uralsky (900),
Kavkazsky (760), Belogorye (690), Poronaisky (677),
Bolonsky, Ust'-Lensky (600 each), and Khopersky (500 participants).
Festivals and marathons were also held in national parks (a total of 68
events). The best results as to the variety of the events and number belong
to the national parks Kenozersky, Losiny Ostrov (12 each) and Sochinsky
(10). The largest numbers of participants belong to the national parks Sochinsky
(4,825), Losiny Ostrov (1,400) and Pribaikalsky (1,245).
Schoolchildren helped PNA staffers in arranging artificial breeding sites
for birds, collecting rubbish, facilitating parking, ecological paths and
recreational zones, tree planting, etc. within 34 reserves and 18 national
parks.
Thirty-eight reserves and 12 national parks provided ecological summer
camps for schoolchildren. Most distinguished here were the national parks
Valdaisky, Vodlozersky, Kenozersky, Nechkinsky, Shushensky Bor, and
the reserves Altaisky, Daursky, Zhigulevsky,
Kavkazsky, Kostomukshsky, Lazovsky and Nurgush. In 13 national
parks schoolchildren completed 179 scientific research works. Students improved
their practical knowledge by engaging in scientific research at 34 reserves.
In 2002, numerous excursions for teenagers and schoolchildren were held
in 48 reserves and 18 national parks with a total of 50,000 participants.
The leaders here were the national parks Losiny Ostrov (15,500 children
and teenagers), Plescheevo Ozero (2,500), Nizhnyaya Kama (1,653),
Smolenskoye Poozerye (1,641), Sochinsky (1,147), and the reserves
Laplandsky (6,350), Volzhsko-Kamsky (3,927), Kavkazsky
(2,398), Belogorye (2,510), Shulgan-Tash (2,300), Khopersky
(2,000), Lazovsky (1,750), Malaya Sos’va (1,719), Severo-Osetinsky
(1,600), Khingansky (1,436), Sayano-Shushensky (1,371)
and Kostomukshsky (1,023).
In 2002, the staffers of 19 reserves and 8 national parks organized 154
school parties dedicated to conservation topics (reserves gave 98 parties
and national parks — 56). The events with the best attendance were those
organized by the staffers of the reserves Privolzhskaya Lesosteppe, Pechero-Ilychsky,
Vitimsky, Lazovsky, Voroninsky, Kurilsky, Taimyrsky, and national parks
Shushensky Bor and Sochinsky.
Round-table discussions for schoolchildren were held by 25 reserves and
10 national parks. The best results were shown by Khopersky reserve
(15 round tables), Losiny Ostrov NP(10), and Shulgan-Tash
reserve(7).
Eighteen reserves conducted sociological polls among children and teenagers.
Interaction with Schoolteachers and Educational Authorities
Many reserves and national parks focused on interaction with teachers and
educational authorities. Eco-education tools included setting up topical
seminars and consultations, arranging upgrading courses for teachers, providing
them with informational and methodical literature, visual aids, etc.
In 2002, the staffers of the national parks Nizhnyaya Kama and Plescheevo
Ozero delivered regular courses for teachers; single lectures were delivered
in 11 national parks. Their audience comprised a total of 2,802 teachers.
In 2002, 44 reserves and 12 national parks were hosts to 202 conferences
for teachers. The leaders as to the number of arranged conferences are the
national parks Russky Sever (15), Plescheevo Ozero (9), Nizhnyaya
Kama (5), and reserves Verkhne-Tazovsky (12), Bashkirsky (10),
Kandalakshsky, Khakassky (6 each), Belogorye, Voroninsky, Daursky,
Komandorsky, Kostomukshsky, Magadansky and Prissursky (5 each).
The staffers of 12 national parks delivered 187 lectures on methodology
and talks for the audience of 1,510 teachers.
The staffers of 35 reserves and 11 national parks provided guidelines,
manuals and draft instructions for teachers. The best results here belong
to the national park Smolenskoye Poozerye and the reserves Bolshaya
Kokshaga, Volzhsko-Kamsky and Yuzhno-Uralsky.
Upgrading programs for teachers on relevant subjects were elaborated in
12 reserves (Darvinsky, Komandorsky, Dzhugdzhursky, Kostomukshsky, Kuznetsky
Alatau, Magadansky, Pechero-Ilychsky, Prisursky, Sikhote-Alinsky, Khakassky,
Tsentralno-Lesnoyand Shulgan-Tash) and 4 national parks
(Kenozersky, Plescheevo Ozero, Paanayarvi and Sebezhsky).
Thirty-seven reserves provided resource aid to teachers in the form of
literature materials and methodical guidelines. As to the quantity, the
best results were shown by the reserves Laplandsky, Khakassky,
Daursky and Prisursky.
The staffers of 31 reserves and 12 national parks provided teachers with
thousands of photo- and video materials. Most active here were the reserves
Bogdinsko-Baskunchaksky and Verkhne-Tazovsky and the national
parks Sebezhsky, Kenozersky and Smolenskoye Poozerye.
Liaison with Local Population
Regular courses for local people were given at 5 reserves and 5 national
parks, single lectures, talks and meetings — at 28 reserves and 28 national
parks.
Seminars and conferences with the participation of local people were held
at 12 reserves and 8 national parks.
Contests for local people were held at 27 reserves and 7 national parks;
concerts were organized at 14 reserves and 14 national parks.
Festive events and festivals took place in 21 reserves. The biggest large-scale
events were set up at the Zhigulevsky (3,910 participants), Khakassky
(1,500), Vitimsky (1,350) and Stolby (1,000) reserves.
Parties on conservation topics were held in 14 reserves. As to the number
of participants, the leaders are the reserves Shulgan-Tash (100),
Poronaisky (67) and Komandorsky (50). The staffers of 14 reserves
organized 42 round-table discussions; the biggest round tables were held
by the Sayano-Shushensky (67 participants)and Khakassky
(60) reserves.
Twenty-six reserves showed video films for local people, and 29 reserves
and 26 national parks led excursions. Most numerous were the excursions
organized by the national parks Sochinsky (44,948 visitors), Smolenskoye
Poozerye (19,684), Plescheevo Ozero (5,690), Russky Sever
(5,338) and reserves Shulgan-tash (6,111) and Kavkazsky (6,000).
Rallies and marches were carried out in 16 reserves.
Sociological studies and surveys were carried out in 14 reserves (Volzhsko-Kamsky,
Dzhugdzhursky, Kavkazsky, Norsky, Polistovsky, Privolzhskaya Lesosteppe,
Putoransky, Sayano-Shushensky, Ust'-Lensky, Khakassky, Khingansky, Tsentralno-Lesnoy,
Cherniye Zemli, and Shulgan-Tash) and 10 national parks. Thus,
in Norsky reserve 350 people were polled, in Khingansky —
312, in Ust'-Lensky — 300.
Twenty-two reserves and 20 national parks involved local people in work
in PNAs on a volunteer basis.
In 2002, over 100,000 local people were involved in different activities
initiated by national parks. In the reserve system, the most successful
in attracting people to various events initiated by reserve staffers were
the reserves: Kuznetsky Alatau (50,515), Kavkazsky (26,154),
Shulgan-Tash (7,439), Khakassky (3,235), Sayano-Shushensky
(2,060), Belogorye (1,998), Khingansky (1,901), Lazovsky
(1,414), Voroninsky (1,390), Vitimsky (1,350), Daursky
(1,328), Taimyrsky (1,284), and Tsentralno-Lesnoy (1,037).
Ecological Festivals and Campaigns
The March for Parks Campaign was the largest event held by reserves and
national parks in 2002. Fifty-four reserves and 17 national parks took part
(see Table 1).
Table 1. Participation of reserves and national parks
in international
and all-Russian Ecological Festivals and Campaigns
Name of festival or campaign
Number of participating organizations
Reserves
National parks
March for Parks
54
17
Birds Day
31
15
Earth Day
29
11
Animals Day
14
5
Ecological Danger Defense Day
14
3
Forest Day
10
6
Europark Day
2
6
In 12 reserves and 3 national parks the staffers held an Open House; 25
reserves and a number of national parks celebrated their birthdays festively.
Public activities, such as festivals, marathons, rallies, marches, concerts,
etc. were timed to coincide with ecological holidays. The staff of the reserves
and national parks, authorities, environmental activists and scientists
gave speeches; special agitprop teams organized shows. The activities attracted
crowds and much publicity in the media. The staffers of the following national
parks organized the most numerous campaigns: Plescheevo Ozero, Vodlozersky,
Alaniya, Kenozersky and Sochinsky.
Thirty-two reserves and 13 national parks worked with NGOs. Most active
here were the reserves Prisursky, Daursky, Kronotsky, Khakassky, Nizhne-Svirsky,
Privolzhskaya Lesosteppe, Sikhote-Alinsky, Tsentralno-Lesnoy, Shulgan-Tash,
Bolshaya Kokshaga, Kavkazsky, Kurilsky, Belogorye, Volzhsko-Kamsky, Laplandsky,
Poronaisky, and national parks Mariy Chodra, Russky Sever, Losiny
Ostrov, Plescheevo Ozero and Smolenskoye Poozerye.
In general, all the state nature reserves and national parks participated
somehow in eco-education and eco-training activities in 2002. According
to the Department of Protected Natural Areas, Objects and Biodiversity Conservation,
the most comprehensive and efficient work in the sphere of eco-education
was done by the staff of the following reserves: Astrakhansky,
Baikalsky, Barguzinsky, Belogorye,
Bolshaya Kokshaga, Bolshoi Arktichesky, Volzhsko-Kamsky,
Voronezhsky, Darvinsky, Daursky,
Kavkazsky, Kostomukshsky, Lazovsky,
Laplandsky, Sayano-Shushensky, Sikhote-Alinsky,
Khakassky, Tsentralno-Lesnoy, and Shulgan-Tash,
and the following national parks:Kenozersky, Losiny
Ostrov, Nizhnyaya Kama, Paanayarvi,
Plescheevo Ozero, Smolenskoye Poozerye, Sebezhsky,
Sochinsky, Ugra, and Shushensky Bor.