«DECISION-MAKING ISSUES»
STATE NATURE RESERVE FINANCING IN 2001: SUMMARY
The records of state nature reserves under the Russian Ministry of Natural
Resources (MNR) show that the total budget in 2001 for the entire system of
reserves amounted to 348,192,000 rubles*
(versus 265,223,000 rubles in 2000) and came from various sources (see Table
1).
Table 1. Sources of financing for MNR state nature reserves in 2001 and 2000
Sources
of Financing
|
2001
|
2000
|
Change in Share of Financing Source
|
Growth
of Financing Source,
%
|
Total, thousand rubles
|
Share
of Source, %
|
Total, thousand rubles
|
Share
of Source, %
|
Federal budget, including State Ecology Fund |
232 640 |
66,8 |
130 281 |
49,1 |
+17,7 |
+ 79 |
Regional & local budgets;
non- budgetary funds |
43 949 |
12,6 |
40 036 |
15,1 |
- 2,5 |
+ 10 |
Foreign grants |
40 241 |
11,6 |
66 120 |
24,9 |
-13,3 |
- 39 |
Reserve earnings |
26 096 |
7,5 |
21 004 |
8,0 |
– 0,5 |
+24 |
Russian grants |
5 266 |
1,5 |
7782 |
2,9 |
- 1,4 |
-32 |
TOTAL
|
348 192 |
100 |
265 223 |
100 |
0 |
+ 31 | For the structure of the reserves' own earnings, see Table 2.
Table 2. Structure of state nature reserves' own earnings in
2001 (versus in 2000)
Item of Income |
Sum,
in rubles
|
Revenues from visitor service |
7112 (5713) |
Revenues from timber felling and sales of timber
and timber products |
1401 (629) |
Revenues from other types of exploitation permissible
in reserves and their buffer zones
(including transit fees) |
1721 (1929) |
Collected fines, claims, realization of property
forfeited to the State |
3152 (2960) |
Contractual research work (not paid for out of the
federal budget) |
5820 (5643) |
Other activities |
6890 (4130) |
TOTAL |
26 096 (21 004) |
In 2001, 54 state nature reserves received foreign grants. The main grants
came from the Global Environmental Facility (68% of all the grants), the
World Wide Fund for Nature (11%), and U.S. government agencies (10%).
Grants received from Russian sponsors amounted to 5,266,000 rubles (versus
7,782,000 rubles in 2000). The involvement of various types of sponsors
is shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Russian sponsors' involvement
in financing state nature reserves in 2001
Organization
|
Sum,
rubles
| Industrial organizations
| 1684 | Banks
| 27 | Transport enterprises
| 308 | Trade firms
| 95 | Advertising agencies
| 49 |
Other organizations
| 690 |
Non-profit organizations
| 715 | Individuals
| 1698 |
TOTAL
| 5266 |
There is no "typical" nature reserve in Russia since each reserve has its
own profile and specifics. The indices given here are simply to satisfy
our own statistical curiosity.
In 2001, the average annual budget of a reserve was around 3,665,000 rubles
(versus 2,949,000 rubles in 2000). The reserves with the largest and smallest
budgets in 2001 are given in Table 4.
Table 4. Reserves with largest and smallest budgets in
2001
Reserves with Largest Budgets
|
Reserves with Smallest Budgets
|
Name
|
Budget,
thousand rubles
|
Share
of Federal Funds,
%
|
Name
|
Budget,
thousand rubles
|
Share
of Federal Funds,
%
|
Teberdinsky |
11498
|
62
|
Bogdinsko-Baskunchaksky
|
967
|
95
|
Laplandsky
|
10178
|
34
|
Dagestansky
|
1119
|
90
|
Yuzhno-Uralsky
|
8941
|
74
|
Polistovsky
|
1177
|
100
|
Yugansky
|
8770
|
29
|
Basegi
|
1235
|
70
|
Malaya Sos’va
|
8610
|
30
|
Nurgush |
1261
|
98
|
Astrakhansky
|
8407
|
27
|
Denezhkin Kamen’
|
1280
|
76
|
Baikalo-Lensky
|
8065
|
81
|
Kaluzhskiye Zaseki
|
1286
|
91
|
Voronezhsky
|
7076
|
63
|
Bastak
|
1369
|
80
|
Baikalsky
|
6981
|
68
|
Nizhne-Svirsky
|
1441
|
79
|
Kavkazsky
|
6769
|
73
|
Mordovsky
|
1513
|
82
|
Of 95 reserves, 57 had budgets below average.
In 2001, 86 (versus 88 in 2000) reserves received money from the budgets and
non-budgetary funds of federal bodies and municipal funds. The reserves with
the most income from these sources are shown in Table 5. The regions that assisted
their local nature reserves the most and least are shown in Table 6.
Table 5. Reserves with the most income from regional
and local budgets and non-budgetary funds in 2001
Reserve | Financing,
in thousand rubles | Share of the Budget,
% | Yugansky | 5990 | 68 | Malaya Sos'va | 5953 | 69 | Laplandsky
| 3832 | 38 | Astrakhansky
| 3067 | 36 | Verkhne-Tazovsky | 2064 | 47 | Putoransky
| 1356 | 47 | Yuzhno-Uralsky | 1249 | 14 | Voronezhsky
| 1234 | 17 | Volzhsko-Kamsky | 1215 | 53 | Zhigulevsky
| 1089 | 38 |
Table 6. Regions that provided the most and least financial support to MNR state nature reserves
from regional and local budgets and non-budgetary funds in 2001
Regions that Provided the most Support
|
Regions that Provided
the Least
|
Region
|
Sum,
thousand rubles
| Share of Total Budget Region’s Reserves,
% |
Region
|
Sum,
thousand
rubles
| Khanty-Mansi
Aut. Area | 11943 | 69 | Republic of Adygei | 0 | Murmansk Region | 4675 | | Republic of Mariy-El | 0 | Yamalo-Nenetsky Aut. Area
| 2345 | | Pskov Region
| 0 | Republic of Bashkortostan
| 1811 | | Chukot Aut. Area
| 0 | Astrakhan Region
| 3077 | | Koryak Aut. Area
| 0 | Samara Region
| 1089 | 38 | Even Aut. Area
| 0 | Voronezh Region
| 1609 | | Ingush Republic
| 0 | Khabarovsk Territory
| 1271 | | Kaluga Region
| 3 | Krasnoyarsk Territory
| 2432 | | Penza Region
| 10 | Republic of Tatarstan
| 1215 | | Kirov Region
| 25 |
In 2001, 88 reserves (versus 85 in 2000) earned income independently. The reserves
that earned the most are listed in Table 7.
Table 7. Reserves that earned the most independently in
2001
Reserve
|
Earnings,
rubles
| Budget Share,
% | Poronaisky
| 4124 | 73 | Laplandsky
| 2394 | 24 | Astrakhansky
| 2182 | 26 | Khronotsky
| 2149 | 80 | Kavkazsky
| 1329 | 20 | Yuzhno-Uralsky | 1054 | 12 | Chernye Zemli | 727 | 30 | Kivach | 668 | 28 | Bashkirsky
| 650 | 10 | Nenetsky
| 648 | 14 |
In 2001, 54 reserves received foreign grants (versus 74 in 2000). The reserves with the highest income from foreign grants are listed in Table 8.
Table 8. Reserves that received the most support from foreign
grants in 2001
Reserves
| Foreign Grant Money,
thousand rubles | Budget Share,
% | Sikhote-Alinsky | 2416 | 34 | Bolshaya Kokshaga | 2265 | 64 | Teberdinsky
| 2981 | 26 | Baikalsky
| 1929 | 26 | Lazovsky
| 1600 | 27 | Dzhygdzhursky
| 1759 | 32 | Sokhondinsky
| 1912 | 39 | Pinezhsky
| 1909 | 54 | Baikalsky
| 1829 | 26 | Bolshekhekhtsyrsky
| 2172 | 51 |
In 2001, 47 reserves received financial support from Russian sponsors (versus 56 in 2000). See Table 9.
Table 9. Reserves that received the most support from Russian
sponsors in 2001
Reserves
| Russian Grant Money,
thousand rubles | Budget Share,
% | Astrakhansky
| 885 | 11 | Laplandsky
| 509 | 5 | Sayano-Shushensky
| 451 | 8 | Katunsky
| 384 | 12 | Bureinsky
| 280 | 10 | Bashkirsky
| 275 | 4 | Vishersky
| 210 | 9 | Koryaksky
| 210 | 12 | Kuznetsky-Alatau | 170 | 7 | Nizhne-Svirsky | 160 | 11 |
Overall, the financing of reserves in 2001, as compared to financing in
2000, can be characterized as follows:
- Financing of reserves from the federal budget increased significantly
(by 79%). This is the first time in recent years that the share of federal
budget money in the total reserves budget increased (by 17%);
- Financing from regional and local budgets and non-budgetary funds increased
by 10%. However, the share of financing from this source in the total
reserves budget decreased by 2.5%;
- Reserves’ own earnings increased by 24%. However, there was a slight
decrease of the budget share of reserves’ earnings (0.5%);
- Foreign grants decreased significantly (39%). This is the first time
in recent years that the share of foreign grant funds in the total budget
decreased (by 13.3%);
- Financing from Russian sponsors also decreased significantly (by 32%);
the budget share also decreased (by 1.4%).
V. B. Stepanitsky,
Manager of Federal Projects,
WWF
*Average weighted $ rate was 1 USD=29.15
rubles in 2001; 1 USD=27.6 rubles in 2000
<< | contents
| top | >>
| |
|