The records of state nature reserves under the Russian Ministry of Natural
Resources (MNR) show that the total budget in 2001 for the entire system of
reserves amounted to 348,192,000 rubles*
(versus 265,223,000 rubles in 2000) and came from various sources (see Table
1).
Table 1. Sources of financing for MNR state nature reserves in 2001 and 2000
Sources
of Financing
2001
2000
Change in Share of Financing Source
Growth
of Financing Source,
%
Total, thousand rubles
Share
of Source, %
Total, thousand rubles
Share
of Source, %
Federal budget, including State Ecology Fund
232 640
66,8
130 281
49,1
+17,7
+ 79
Regional & local budgets;
non- budgetary funds
43 949
12,6
40 036
15,1
- 2,5
+ 10
Foreign grants
40 241
11,6
66 120
24,9
-13,3
- 39
Reserve earnings
26 096
7,5
21 004
8,0
– 0,5
+24
Russian grants
5 266
1,5
7782
2,9
- 1,4
-32
TOTAL
348 192
100
265 223
100
0
+ 31
For the structure of the reserves' own earnings, see Table 2.
Table 2. Structure of state nature reserves' own earnings in
2001 (versus in 2000)
Item of Income
Sum,
in rubles
Revenues from visitor service
7112 (5713)
Revenues from timber felling and sales of timber
and timber products
1401 (629)
Revenues from other types of exploitation permissible
in reserves and their buffer zones
(including transit fees)
1721 (1929)
Collected fines, claims, realization of property
forfeited to the State
3152 (2960)
Contractual research work (not paid for out of the
federal budget)
5820 (5643)
Other activities
6890 (4130)
TOTAL
26 096 (21 004)
In 2001, 54 state nature reserves received foreign grants. The main grants
came from the Global Environmental Facility (68% of all the grants), the
World Wide Fund for Nature (11%), and U.S. government agencies (10%).
Grants received from Russian sponsors amounted to 5,266,000 rubles (versus
7,782,000 rubles in 2000). The involvement of various types of sponsors
is shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Russian sponsors' involvement
in financing state nature reserves in 2001
Organization
Sum,
rubles
Industrial organizations
1684
Banks
27
Transport enterprises
308
Trade firms
95
Advertising agencies
49
Other organizations
690
Non-profit organizations
715
Individuals
1698
TOTAL
5266
There is no "typical" nature reserve in Russia since each reserve has its
own profile and specifics. The indices given here are simply to satisfy
our own statistical curiosity.
In 2001, the average annual budget of a reserve was around 3,665,000 rubles
(versus 2,949,000 rubles in 2000). The reserves with the largest and smallest
budgets in 2001 are given in Table 4.
Table 4. Reserves with largest and smallest budgets in
2001
Reserves with Largest Budgets
Reserves with Smallest Budgets
Name
Budget,
thousand rubles
Share
of Federal Funds,
%
Name
Budget,
thousand rubles
Share
of Federal Funds,
%
Teberdinsky
11498
62
Bogdinsko-Baskunchaksky
967
95
Laplandsky
10178
34
Dagestansky
1119
90
Yuzhno-Uralsky
8941
74
Polistovsky
1177
100
Yugansky
8770
29
Basegi
1235
70
Malaya Sos’va
8610
30
Nurgush
1261
98
Astrakhansky
8407
27
Denezhkin Kamen’
1280
76
Baikalo-Lensky
8065
81
Kaluzhskiye Zaseki
1286
91
Voronezhsky
7076
63
Bastak
1369
80
Baikalsky
6981
68
Nizhne-Svirsky
1441
79
Kavkazsky
6769
73
Mordovsky
1513
82
Of 95 reserves, 57 had budgets below average.
In 2001, 86 (versus 88 in 2000) reserves received money from the budgets and
non-budgetary funds of federal bodies and municipal funds. The reserves with
the most income from these sources are shown in Table 5. The regions that assisted
their local nature reserves the most and least are shown in Table 6.
Table 5. Reserves with the most income from regional
and local budgets and non-budgetary funds in 2001
Reserve
Financing,
in thousand rubles
Share of the Budget,
%
Yugansky
5990
68
Malaya Sos'va
5953
69
Laplandsky
3832
38
Astrakhansky
3067
36
Verkhne-Tazovsky
2064
47
Putoransky
1356
47
Yuzhno-Uralsky
1249
14
Voronezhsky
1234
17
Volzhsko-Kamsky
1215
53
Zhigulevsky
1089
38
Table 6. Regions that provided the most and least financial support to MNR state nature reserves
from regional and local budgets and non-budgetary funds in 2001
Regions that Provided the most Support
Regions that Provided
the Least
Region
Sum,
thousand rubles
Share of Total Budget Region’s Reserves,
%
Region
Sum,
thousand
rubles
Khanty-Mansi
Aut. Area
11943
69
Republic of Adygei
0
Murmansk Region
4675
Republic of Mariy-El
0
Yamalo-Nenetsky Aut. Area
2345
Pskov Region
0
Republic of Bashkortostan
1811
Chukot Aut. Area
0
Astrakhan Region
3077
Koryak Aut. Area
0
Samara Region
1089
38
Even Aut. Area
0
Voronezh Region
1609
Ingush Republic
0
Khabarovsk Territory
1271
Kaluga Region
3
Krasnoyarsk Territory
2432
Penza Region
10
Republic of Tatarstan
1215
Kirov Region
25
In 2001, 88 reserves (versus 85 in 2000) earned income independently. The reserves
that earned the most are listed in Table 7.
Table 7. Reserves that earned the most independently in
2001
Reserve
Earnings,
rubles
Budget Share,
%
Poronaisky
4124
73
Laplandsky
2394
24
Astrakhansky
2182
26
Khronotsky
2149
80
Kavkazsky
1329
20
Yuzhno-Uralsky
1054
12
Chernye Zemli
727
30
Kivach
668
28
Bashkirsky
650
10
Nenetsky
648
14
In 2001, 54 reserves received foreign grants (versus 74 in 2000). The reserves with the highest income from foreign grants are listed in Table 8.
Table 8. Reserves that received the most support from foreign
grants in 2001
Reserves
Foreign Grant Money,
thousand rubles
Budget Share,
%
Sikhote-Alinsky
2416
34
Bolshaya Kokshaga
2265
64
Teberdinsky
2981
26
Baikalsky
1929
26
Lazovsky
1600
27
Dzhygdzhursky
1759
32
Sokhondinsky
1912
39
Pinezhsky
1909
54
Baikalsky
1829
26
Bolshekhekhtsyrsky
2172
51
In 2001, 47 reserves received financial support from Russian sponsors (versus 56 in 2000). See Table 9.
Table 9. Reserves that received the most support from Russian
sponsors in 2001
Reserves
Russian Grant Money,
thousand rubles
Budget Share,
%
Astrakhansky
885
11
Laplandsky
509
5
Sayano-Shushensky
451
8
Katunsky
384
12
Bureinsky
280
10
Bashkirsky
275
4
Vishersky
210
9
Koryaksky
210
12
Kuznetsky-Alatau
170
7
Nizhne-Svirsky
160
11
Overall, the financing of reserves in 2001, as compared to financing in
2000, can be characterized as follows:
Financing of reserves from the federal budget increased significantly
(by 79%). This is the first time in recent years that the share of federal
budget money in the total reserves budget increased (by 17%);
Financing from regional and local budgets and non-budgetary funds increased
by 10%. However, the share of financing from this source in the total
reserves budget decreased by 2.5%;
Reserves’ own earnings increased by 24%. However, there was a slight
decrease of the budget share of reserves’ earnings (0.5%);
Foreign grants decreased significantly (39%). This is the first time
in recent years that the share of foreign grant funds in the total budget
decreased (by 13.3%);
Financing from Russian sponsors also decreased significantly (by 32%);
the budget share also decreased (by 1.4%).
V. B. Stepanitsky,
Manager of Federal Projects,
WWF
*Average weighted $ rate was 1 USD=29.15
rubles in 2001; 1 USD=27.6 rubles in 2000